Wednesday, 9 January 2013

Over 75s face continued digital exclusion

Mobile phones are becoming universal for younger people, whilst people aged over 75 are continuing to find themselves digitally excluded, according to Ofcom.

The 2012 Consumer Experience Report, published this week, also highlights how age is continuing to play a role in switching services, with older people less likely than younger people to move supplier.

Mobile phones universal for younger people
The Consumer Experience highlights how mobile penetration has grown and points out that use amongst younger people is virtually universal (98% among 16-24s and 97% among 25-44s).

Ownership of a mobile phone is lower among older age groups, with just over four in five 65-74s and three in five adults aged over 75 owning a mobile device.

Smartphone use has grown over recent years with seven in ten 16-24s now using a smartphone. More than a third of 45-64 year olds now own a smartphone but under one in ten 65-74s and just 3% of over-75s do so.

The over 75s
The report paints a disappointing picture for those concerned with how to encourage older people online. Since the last survey there has been a small drop in the percentage of those aged over 75 with broadband at home (26% to 23%). One in four aged 75+ use the internet, the same figure as 2011.

Whilst 15% of 25-44 year olds have a tablet PC, just 4% of 65-74 and 1% of over 75s do.

The report highlights that these trends are not necessarily down to a lack of interest, noting that “involuntary non-ownership of internet has risen significantly among those aged over 75″. Cost is likely to be a factor, as well as continuing issues over ease of use. Ofcom report that 54% over 75s have difficulty using PC compared with 3% 16-24 year olds.

Switching services
Those aged over 65s are less likely than younger people to have switched their communications provider. But they also seem to be slightly more satisfied with the service they receive.

This raises fascinating questions about age and shopping around. Are older people more tolerant or do they have lower expectations of services than younger people. Or are technology companies providing services which better suit the needs of older people?

Our work on older consumers highlighted the lack of data about shopping around and age. Ofcom could usefully commission further qualitative work to explore why the rates of switching vary by age.

Disability and technology
The report highlights the links between disability and internet use. Home internet is significantly lower among each of the disability groups studied by Ofcom, with age playing an important role.

Yet whilst disabled people aged 15 -34 have comparable internet access to non disabled people, those aged over 35 with visual or mobility impairment fall behind those without an impairment of the same age group.

The report also highlights that those over 65 with a visual impairment are significantly less likely than other over 65s to have a mobile (65%).

ILC-UK and technology
Over recent years, ILC-UK have published a number of reports on technology across the lifecourse. Most recently, with the support of Nominet Trust we published “Nudge or Compel? Can behavioural economics tackle the digital exclusion of older people?”. Our work on technology and age can be found on our website.

David Sinclair
Thanks to @rich_w for flagging some of the disability statistics.

Tuesday, 1 January 2013

A day at the Paralympics


We spent a day on the Olympic Park watching the Paralympics in August.
















We watched some disabled football.
















And some goalball. Which I enjoyed a lot. George, less so.

















We headed back to the hockey stadium to watch the England team play football.






















And saw a Mexican wave.


We watched wheelchair tennis.



Before popping in to see the Wheelchair Basketball.




Olympic Park: Venues


We spent a day at the Olympic Park during the Paralympics. And took a few photos of the venues.

A photo of athletes village from the Coca Cola installation
















The park live venue with the basketball arena in the background



The Olympic Stadium and the Copperbox from the top of the Hockey arena
















And the Basketball arena from the Hockey stadium
















The Velodrome
















The Olympic Stadium
















Another pic of the Velodrome
















And one of the basketball arena





George's Birthday


George's fourth birthday party. New Year's eve 2010.



Monday, 31 December 2012

Christmas 2010


Two years ago (Christmas 2010) we spent Christmas at Butlins in Bognor.

We saw Dora.

















A reindeer or two.

















Ate cakes.























And celebrated with fireworks.

Sunday, 30 December 2012

Christmas PJ's


What do you think of my Christmas PJ's?


Christmas day: The food


Last week I posted the Christmas menu

This is what the food looked like.

Some nibbles to start.

















My sprout surprise was a single pasta parcel, filled with sprout, bacon, ricotta and garlic. The plates are smaller than they look.


Then a home made Chicken liver pate. (Clarence the Angel Surprise)

















Then we each got a single Avocado Prawn Tempura with a home made dip.

















And a mini Spicy Parsnip soup.

















I made a sorbet but forgot to take a photo.

Then we had Cheese Cauliflower. Fried Camembert (Panko Breadcrumbs) served with cranberry sauce and a cauliflower sauce.

















Then a mini roast with fondant potatoes.






















A mini home made chocolate orange mouse served in a little edible chocolate pot.

















And finally. Christmas Pudding and Vanilla Ice Cream. I cooked the pudding and mixed with the Ice Cream the day before and put it back in the freezer.



Wrexham vs Tamworth 29 December 2012


Watching the football.

















Sarah and Paul are enjoying the game.



Sunday, 23 December 2012

Christmas menu 2012



This year is the first year we are spending Christmas at our own home with George. So it gives me an excuse to do a a different sort of Christmas lunch. What do you think of the menu?























Update: I've now posted some photos of the meal here.

Thursday, 13 December 2012

Government sleight of hand on Disabled Facilities Grant

This week’s announcement of an additional £40 million central Government investment in disabled facilities grants (DFG) is very welcome (1). But unless the investment is properly evaluated, there is a risk that the additional funding will not reach those who need it most.
 
The DFG provides small grants which support adaptations to the home to allow people to continue to live independently.
 
These grants seem to be cost effective. Speaking at the announcement of the additional funding, Care and Support Minister, Norman Lamb MP noted that “for every £1,000 spent through the Disabled Facilities Grant, the quality of life gains are estimated at £1,723 per year.” (2) The London School of Economics (LSE) Personal Social Services Research Unit, revealed earlier this year that investment in aids and adaptations could result in a net saving of £1.10 for every £1 spend. (3)
 
Government seems to have recognised the importance of the DFG with funding increasing from £56 million in 1997 to £180 million this year (plus the newly announced £40 million). (4)
 
Yet demand (and potential demand) far outstrips the funding available. In 2011, the Building Research Establishment undertook analysis of the English House Condition Survey, revealing that the total amount required to cover grants for all of those who are theoretically eligible under the current rules is £1.9bn at 2005 prices (4). In September this year, the BBC reported on delays in payment, with Newport council cited as taking an average of 638 days to pay the grant.(5)
 
In tight fiscal times, we must welcome the additional investment to a grant which has been relatively protected of spending cuts.
 
But, and there is a big but, not only does the additional spend barely scratch the surface of the potential demand, the additional funding is not ring fenced. In other words, in the spirit of localism, the funding can be spent as the local authority wishes. And local authorities are strapped for cash. The LGA reacted angrily to last week’s autumn statement arguing that “local authorities already face a possible £1bn cut to funding for 2013-14 on top of the 28% reduction set out in the spending review and the further 2% now announced for 2014-15.”(6)
 
So, the Minister announces £40 million for DFG’s. But local authorities, facing other spending pressures can use the money as they wish.
 
The Minister can of course act to ensure that the investment in DFG’s reaches the people who need it. He could find a way of evaluating the impact of the additional spend, alongside perhaps a broader evaluation of the impact of the DFG and its current administration. If central government wants to avoid the accusation giving with one hand, whilst taking with the other, this is essential.
 
David Sinclair
 
(1) £40 million for England. http://www.cot.co.uk/news/cotss-housing/%C2%A340-million-additional-funding-disabled-facilities-grants-england-announced
(2) http://www.dh.gov.uk/health/2012/12/extra-df-grant/
(3) http://www.stannahstairlifts.co.uk/pssru-social-care-report
(4) www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN03011.pdf
(5) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-19721267
(6) http://www.communitycare.co.uk/articles/05/12/2012/118750/more-pain-for-social-care-as-osborne-cuts-extra-445m-from-councils.htm